Cases 41 - 50 of 486
Velasquez v. Cooper et al
as 3:2019cv02158
Petitioner:
William Velasquez
Respondent:
Roy Cooper and PA Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Fleming v. Adams County Prison et al
as 1:2019cv02114
Petitioner:
Ronald L. Fleming, Jr.
Respondent:
PA Attorney General, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and Adams County Prison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Peno v. Garman et al
as 1:2019cv02082
Respondent:
Supt. Mark Garman, PA Attorney General and District Attorney's Office of Dauphin County
Petitioner:
Kevin Paul Peno
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rivera v. Ransom
as 4:2019cv01880
Petitioner:
Juan Rivera, Jr.
Respondent:
. Kevin Ransom, PA Attorney General and Kevin Ransom
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Smart v. Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania et al
as 3:2019cv02097
Petitioner:
Fabian D. Smart
Respondent:
PA Attorney General and Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Scott v. Luther et al
as 4:2019cv01720
Respondent:
Jamey Luther and PA Attorney General
Petitioner:
Ronald Andrew Scott, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Stewart v. Tice et al
as 1:2019cv01294
Respondent:
Eric W Tice, PA Attorney General and District Attorney Dauphin County District Attorney
Petitioner:
Shawn A. Stewart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hoffman v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2019cv01173
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, John E. Wetzel, Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole and others
Petitioner:
Richard Lee Hoffman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Riccardi v. Smith et al
as 1:2019cv01289
Petitioner:
Elvis Aaron Riccardi
Respondent:
Superintendent Barry Smith and PA Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hooker v. Harry et al
as 1:2019cv01352
Respondent:
Kenneth A Mummah, Emily Mezzner, Laurel Harry and others
Petitioner:
George J Hooker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
