Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Hauman v. Coleman et al
as 1:2015cv01159
Petitioner:
Darin L. Hauman
Respondent:
Brian V. Coleman and The Attorney General Of the State of Pennsylvania
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DiPietro v. The Department of Corrections and Its Employees Listed Herein et al
as 1:2015cv01137
Plaintiff:
Nicodemo DiPietro
Defendant:
The Department of Corrections and Its Employees Listed Herein, Daniel Mienert, John T. Wetzel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martinez v. Coleman et al
as 1:2015cv01073
Petitioner:
Victor Martinez
Respondent:
Brian V. Coleman and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Fermin v. Coleman et al
as 1:2015cv00973
Petitioner:
Rafael Fermin
Respondent:
Brian V. Coleman and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BONILLA v. COLEMAN et al
as 3:2015cv00730
Petitioner:
Matthew J. Bonilla
Respondent:
Brian V. Coleman and Kathleen Kane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Schlager v. Coleman et al
as 3:2014cv01964
Petitioner:
Damien Schlager
Respondent:
Brian V. Coleman and PA Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reeves v. Coleman et al
as 3:2014cv01500
Petitioner:
Jerry Reeves
Respondent:
Brian V. Coleman and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Caballero v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2014cv01380
Petitioner:
Wilfredo Caballero
Respondent:
John Wetzel, Brian V. Coleman and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Zimmerman v. Coleman et al
as 3:2014cv00313
Petitioner:
Jeffrey L Zimmerman
Respondent:
Brian V. Coleman and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
TEMPLE v. COLEMAN et al
as 3:2012cv02615
Petitioner:
Dion A. Temple
Respondent:
Brian V. Coleman and Andrew Jarbola
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
