Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Burton v. Crawford et al
as 4:2024cv00761
Plaintiff:
Dante Burton
Defendant:
C.O. Crawford, C.O. Cebrick, Unit Manager Grohowski and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Hill v. Rivello et al
as 3:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Hill
Defendant:
John Rivello, Captain Long, Lieutenant Yonkers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hawley v. Salamon et al
as 3:2023cv01434
Plaintiff:
Antonio James Hawley
Defendant:
Warden Bobbi Jo Salamon, New RHU Unit Manager Cris Miller, Lt. Butler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Collymore v. Estock et al
as 1:2023cv00596
Plaintiff:
Derrell Collymore
Defendant:
Lee Estock, C.O. George, C.O. John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vasquez v. Haste et al
as 1:2021cv00019
Defendant:
Brian S. Clark, Lt. Tim Manwiller, Mike Pries and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Vasquez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carr v. Doe et al
as 1:2020cv01209
Defendant:
C.O. John Doe, Menteel, Superintendent Gourley and others
Plaintiff:
Donald Carr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Branford v. United States of America
as 1:2019cv01023
Defendant:
United States of America, C.O. John Doe One and Two, Lieutenant Cain and others
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Branford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bourne v. C.O. John Doe one et al
as 3:2013cv01195
Plaintiff:
Robert M. Bourne
Defendant:
C.O. John Doe one, C.O. John Doe two, C.O. John Doe three and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Luciano v. Varano et al
as 1:2009cv01362
Plaintiff:
Bryan Aponte Luciano
Defendant:
Superintendent David A. Varano, C.O. (John Doe) Butts, C.O. (John Doe) Touchlowskie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lombardo v. C.O. John Doe et al
as 4:2008cv01395
Plaintiff:
Francis Anthony Lombardo
Defendant:
C.O. John Doe, Piontkowski, Luchetti and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
