Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Bailey v. Religious Accomodation Committe, et al.
as 3:2014cv01776
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Bailey
Defendant:
Religious Accommodation Committee, John E Wezel, Vincent Mooney and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Whitney v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2014cv00357
Plaintiff:
Charles Whitney
Defendant:
Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, John E. Wetzel, M. Lamas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rizzuto v. Wetzel et al
as 3:2014cv00020
Plaintiff:
Alfonso Rizzuto, Jr.
Defendant:
John E. Wetzel, James C. Barnacle, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marshall v. Corbett et al
as 3:2013cv02961
Plaintiff:
Kerry X Marshall
Defendant:
Tom Corbett, John Wetzel, John K. Murray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martinez v. Jones et al
as 3:2012cv01547
Plaintiff:
Juan Martinez
Defendant:
B Jones, John/Jane Doe-8, Shirley Moore-Smeal and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Clinton v. The Camp Hill Prison et al
as 1:2011cv02200
Plaintiff:
Premous Clinton
Defendant:
The Camp Hill Prison, Doug Hoke, Mary Sabol and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Iverson v. Barnacle et al
as 3:2011cv01483
Plaintiff:
David Iverson
Defendant:
James C. Barnacle, Cindy G. Watson, Brian V. Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Murray et al
as 1:2011cv00313
Petitioner:
Charles Jackson
Respondent:
John K. Murray, Office of the District Attorney and Larry Sachs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Brown v. PA. Dept. of Corrections et al
as 3:2010cv02527
Plaintiff:
Alton D. Brown
Defendant:
PA. Dept. of Corrections, Jeffrey A. Beard, Shirley Moore-Smeal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nixon v. Moore et al
as 1:2010cv02438
Plaintiff:
Mark A. Nixon
Defendant:
Shirley R. Moore, Anne Meyers, Adeeb Rasheed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
