Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Austin v. SCI-Dallas Mailroom Staff et al
as 4:2024cv00886
Defendant:
Former Superintendent Ransom and SCI-Dallas Mailroom Staff
Plaintiff:
Shaun Austin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Coit v. Salamon et al
as 1:2023cv02059
Plaintiff:
Kevin Coit
Defendant:
B. Salamon, M. Rowe, Woodring and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simms v. Wetzel et al
as 3:2020cv01411
Defendant:
S. Pasquale, Dr. Dancha, John DOE and others
Plaintiff:
Shawn M Simms
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
O'Donnell v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2020cv00136
Defendant:
Renee Shrimp, 10 A/POC CO's, Jane/John Doe(s) Psychologists and others
Plaintiff:
Kelley O'Donnell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bush v. Griffin et al
as 1:2019cv01521
Defendant:
Case Manager Shade, Counselor Griffin, Officer Beaver and others
Plaintiff:
Yusuf Bush
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Brown v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2017cv01745
Plaintiff:
Alton D Brown
Defendant:
Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, John E. Wetzel, Daniel Burns and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Glover v. Horvath et al
as 1:2013cv02729
Plaintiff:
Walter Glover
Defendant:
P. Horvath, S.C.I. - Waymart Mailroom, Laura Banta and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ledcke v. PA Dept of Corrections et al
as 1:2011cv02298
Plaintiff:
Shawn Michael Ledcke
Defendant:
PA Dept of Corrections, John Szymanski, Betti and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shover v. York County Prison et al
as 3:2011cv02248
Plaintiff:
Richard Paul Shover, II
Defendant:
Mary E. Sabol, Albert J. Sabol, The County of York York County Prison Mailroom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jennings et al v. Tanner et al
as 3:2009cv00356
Plaintiff:
Troy Jennings and USP Allenwood Inmates
Defendant:
Mark Tanner, R. Martinez, USP Allenwood Mailroom Personnel and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
