Cases 101 - 110 of 143
WINSTON v. BRADFORD WINDOW CO.
as 1:2009cv00226
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL WINSTON
Defendant:
BRADFORD WINDOW CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
IRWIN et al v. SEMAN et al
as 2:2009cv00608
Plaintiff:
RICHARD IRWIN and DONNA IRWIN
Defendant:
GREGORY SEMAN, LUKAS LAEURICIA, NORTH BRADDOCK POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
STUBBS v. COLLINS
as 2:2008cv01567
Plaintiff:
JOHN CHARLES STUBBS
Defendant:
TERRY COLLINS
Cause Of Action: Diversity
MADISON v. GIANT EAGLE, INC. et al
as 1:2009cv00009
Plaintiff:
RODNEY W. MADISON
Defendant:
GIANT EAGLE, INC., JOHN JAIME MEAD, ESQ. and PA STATE POLICE
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
SHAFFER v. WOOD et al
as 2:2009cv00017
Plaintiff:
KIM RONCE SHAFFER, D.D.S
Defendant:
DAVID WOOD, VARSHA MEHTA, ANNE M. MIKOLAJCZAK and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Project Lifesaver, Inc. v. Western Pennsylvania Search and Rescue Development Center et al
as 2:2008cv01735
Plaintiff:
PROJECT LIFESAVER, INC.
Defendant:
WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA SEARCH AND RESCUE DEVELOPMENT CENTER and CYNTHIA A. GARFOLD
Cause Of Action: Diversity
KRAVAS et al v. PRIVATE ADOPTION SERVICES, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv01583
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL KRAVAS and KATHY KRAVAS
Defendant:
PRIVATE ADOPTION SERVICES, INC., CAROLYN MUSSIO and TERRI MUSSIO
Cause Of Action: Diversity
KARALAKSHANA v. LEE
as 2:2008cv00395
Plaintiff:
PETCHBOOBPA KARALAKSHANA
Defendant:
CHENG-HAN LEE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel, Assault, Slander
BAFFOE-BONNIE v. LOCKHARDT, et al
as 3:2008cv00045
Plaintiff:
KWABENA BAFFOE-BONNIE
Defendant:
JOHN LOCKHARDT, JASON CATO and UNKNOWN EMPLOYEES AND SUPERVISORS OF THE PITTSBURGH TRIBUNE-REVIEW
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel, Assault, Slander
BRADLEY v. CONNER
as 2:2007cv01347
Plaintiff:
KIMBALL J. BRADLEY
Defendant:
HERBERT BENNET CONNER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
