Cases 31 - 40 of 44
SWANN et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2012cv01776
Plaintiff:
RICHARD A. SWANN and KRISTEN J. SWANN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2679 Federal Driver's Act
GREENWOOD et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2012cv01133
Plaintiff:
CRAIG A. GREENWOOD and YVONNE M. GREENWOOD
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE and TRAVIS T. TUMBLESON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1402
BARBORAK et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2012cv01048
Plaintiff:
JACQUE BARBORAK and DONNA J. BARBORAK
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANACE COMPANY v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
as 2:2012cv00961
Plaintiff:
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANACE COMPANY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2012cv00917
Plaintiff:
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
CHMEL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2012cv00142
Plaintiff:
ERIK CHMEL
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
HICKS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2010cv00069
Plaintiff:
MELISSA HICKS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
LORENCE v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2009cv00728
Plaintiff:
JOAN LORENCE
Defendant:
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
REHO v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2009cv00036
Plaintiff:
PAUL REHO
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
MILLER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2009cv00001
Plaintiff:
CURTIS MILLER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
