Cases 141 - 150 of 247
HARTZ v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2011cv00290
Plaintiff:
JOYCE M. HARTZ
Defendant:
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
DOE et al v. MONONGAHELA VALLEY HOSPITAL
as 2:2011cv01025
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDRIA DOE , LISA DOE and MELVIN DOE
Defendant:
MONONGAHELA VALLEY HOSPITAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SIGMON v. JOHNS HOPKINS HOSPITAL, et al
as 3:2011cv00177
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL R. SIGMON
Defendant:
JOHNS HOPKINS HOSPITAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
E.F. v. STOCKER et al
as 2:2011cv00977
Plaintiff:
E.F.
Defendant:
KEVIN STOCKER , WASHINGTON OB/GYN ASSOCIATES and THE WASHINGTON HOSPITAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PERRY et al v. KENNETH B. GOODRICH, M.D., P.C. et al
as 1:2011cv00126
Plaintiff:
LISA PERRY and DOUGLAS W. PERRY
Defendant:
KENNETH B. GOODRICH, M.D., P.C. and KENNETH GOODRICH, M.D.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MOSKES et al v. YOUNGDAHL et al
as 2:2011cv00733
Plaintiff:
SEAN P. MOSKES and JENNIFER L. MOSKES
Defendant:
PAULA SUN YOUNGDAHL, TRI-STATE OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, INC., HERITAGE VALLEY BEAVER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SALVIO v. AMGEN, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv00553
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN P. SALVIO
Defendant:
AMGEN, INC. , IMMUNEX, INC. , WYETH, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RODGERS v. THE LASIK VISION INSTITUTE, LLC et al
as 2:2011cv00510
Plaintiff:
KELLY RODGERS
Defendant:
THE LASIK VISION INSTITUTE, LLC and JOHN DOES (I-III)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FRISCHOLZ et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2011cv00507
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM FRISCHOLZ and DENISE FRISCHOLZ
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH PHYSICIANS , JOHN J. MOOSSY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674
DANKO v. UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
as 2:2011cv00466
Plaintiff:
PAUL DANKO, JR.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
