Cases 11 - 20 of 248
TAYLOR v. HALLER
as 2:2023cv01955
Plaintiff:
ASHLEIGH M. TAYLOR
Defendant:
ALEXANDER TOY HALLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
SANTIAGO v. AMERICAN TEXTILE COMPANY, INCORPORATED
as 2:2023cv01811
Plaintiff:
JOHN SANTIAGO
Defendant:
AMERICAN TEXTILE COMPANY, INCORPORATED
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
PELINI et al v. AMSLER et al
as 2:2023cv01685
Defendant:
AG WEALTH SYSTEMS, LLC, DONALD S. AMSLER, D.S.A. SMART FUND, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL PELINI and RICHARD A. PELINI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
GREENTREE MEDICAL CENTER, P.C. v. BURKETT
as 2:2023cv01468
Plaintiff:
GREENTREE MEDICAL CENTER, P.C.
Counter Claimant:
MATTHEW S. BURKETT
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
HAPPY et al v. MARLETTE FUNDING, LLC
as 1:2023cv00265
Plaintiff:
MICHELE HAPPY and CHAD GORDON
Defendant:
MARLETTE FUNDING, LLC doing business as BEST EGG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
ANTHONY et al. v. SWEPI LP et al.
as 1:2023cv00236
Plaintiff:
JEANINE A. ANTHONY, SUMNER R. BEMIS, GEORGENE BEMIS and others
Defendant:
SWEPI LP, SWEPI LLC, SHELL ENTERPRISES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other
SAWYER v. CITIZENS BANK, N.A.
as 2:2023cv00861
Plaintiff:
WALTER SAWYER
Defendant:
CITIZENS BANK, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Fraud
MAIOLO v. BRP US INC.
as 2:2022cv01770
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MAIOLO
Defendant:
BRP US INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
PERRY v. ADIDAS AMERICA, INC.
as 2:2023cv00959
Plaintiff:
BRIAN PERRY
Defendant:
ADIDAS AMERICA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
MCFARLANE v. LAKEVIEW LOAN SERVICING, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv00283
Plaintiff:
CHASITY MCFARLANE
Defendant:
LAKEVIEW LOAN SERVICING, LLC and LOANCARE, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
