Cases 1 - 10 of 19
LEUTHE v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES
as 2:2024cv00714
Plaintiff:
AARON LEUTHE
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
BOODOO v. ON-SITE COMPANIONSHIP SERVICES, INC. et al
as 2:2024cv00451
Plaintiff:
Andrew Boodoo
Defendant:
On-Site Companionship Services, Inc and Derrick Pollock
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
RHODES v. PRIMECARE MEDICAL INC.
as 2:2023cv01539
Plaintiff:
CARLA RHODES
Defendant:
PRIMECARE MEDICAL INC.
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3730 Qui Tam False Claims Act
LOUIS v. PENNSYLVANIA ADULT AND TEEN CHALLENGE
as 2:2023cv01447
Plaintiff:
REVEREND DAVID LOUIS
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA ADULT AND TEEN CHALLENGE
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
KANTORCZYK v. COOK et al
as 2:2022cv00019
Plaintiff:
BRYAN KANTORCZYK
Defendant:
GENE COOK and GENE COOK SUPPORTS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3730 Qui Tam False Claims Act
MCCALL v. KANE et al
as 2:2020cv00924
Defendant:
DEBORAH KANE, JUANITA BARBER, GREGORY NANNY and others
Plaintiff:
DAIJON MCCALL
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
IADELUCA v. HARBORCREEK YOUTH SERVICES
as 1:2020cv00070
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH IADELUCA
Defendant:
HARBORCREEK YOUTH SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv01291
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
CINDRICH v. FISHER et al
as 2:2017cv01650
Plaintiff:
RITA J. CINDRICH
Defendant:
MICHAEL FISHER, GERALD J. PAPPERT, THOMAS W. CORBETT, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
WHOLEY v. UPMC et al
as 2:2013cv01538
Plaintiff:
ROSEANNE WHOLEY
Defendant:
UPMC, DONOHUE CARDIOLOGY ASSOCIATES and BRYAN C. DONOHUE
Not Classified By Court:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
