Cases 91 - 100 of 400
WEEDS, INC. v. INNOVATION HQ, INC.
as 2:2017cv01533
Plaintiff:
WEEDS, INC.
Defendant:
INNOVATION HQ, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121 Trademark Infringement
MICROTECH KNIVES, INC. v. GLOBAL TIME, LLC
as 1:2017cv00270
Plaintiff:
MICROTECH KNIVES, INC.
Defendant:
GLOBAL TACTICAL SUPPLY, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44
SHOP412, LLC v. ARAMARK SERVICES, INC.
as 2:2017cv01229
Plaintiff:
SHOP412, LLC
Defendant:
ARAMARK SERVICES, INC.
Counter_claimant:
ARAMARK SERVICES, INC.
Counter_defendant:
SHOP412, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
FRAMKAT LP et al v. FRAMAR INTERNATIONAL, INC.
as 2:2017cv01102
Plaintiff:
FRAMKAT LP and FRAMESI SPA
Defendant:
FRAMAR INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
BEACON ROOFING SUPPLY, INC. v. MILLER et al
as 2:2017cv01100
Plaintiff:
BEACON ROOFING SUPPLY, INC.
Defendant:
GINGER MILLER and PAUL EFFERIN
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
IMPACT APPLICATIONS, INC. v. IMPAXX SOLUTIONS, INC.
as 2:2017cv00973
Plaintiff:
IMPACT APPLICATIONS, INC.
Defendant:
IMPAXX SOLUTIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44
FI360, INC. v. YCHARTS, INC.
as 2:2017cv00932
Plaintiff:
FI360, INC.
Defendant:
YCHARTS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
PEACE LOVE AND LITTLE DONUTS, LLC v. ALMOST PERFECT, LLC
as 2:2017cv00900
Plaintiff:
PEACE LOVE AND LITTLE DONUTS, LLC
Defendant:
ALMOST PERFECT, LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1836 (a) Injunction against Misappropriation of Trade Secrets
UNIVERSAL ELECTRIC CORPORATION v. BALDWIN et al
as 2:2017cv00842
Plaintiff:
UNIVERSAL ELECTRIC CORPORATION
Defendant:
MARK H. BALDWIN, BALDWIN TECHNOLOGIES, INC., BUSWAY SOLUTIONS, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
W.R. CASE & SONS CUTLERY COMPANY et al v. ROADSIDEIMPORTS, LLC
as 1:2017cv00106
Plaintiff:
W.R. CASE & SONS CUTLERY COMPANY and CASEMARK, INC.
Defendant:
ROADSIDEIMPORTS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
