Other Statutory Actions Cases filed in the US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
NEFF et al v. PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES, LLC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv01028
Plaintiff: CHARLES M. NEFF, JR. and STACY MARIE ADAMS-NEFF
Defendant: PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
HOWARD et al v. LVNV FUNDING, LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv00093
Defendant: LVNV FUNDING, LLC and RESURGENT CAPITAL SERVICES, LP
Plaintiff: VANESSA HOWARD, STACY ADAMS-NEFF, WILLIAM SIMMS and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
ADAMS v. EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.
as 1:2016cv00045
Plaintiff: DEBARA SUE ADAMS
Defendant: EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
TATUM et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2013cv01814
Plaintiff: DENISE TATUM, BOBBY E. ABRAMS, JR., STEFON L. ADAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ADAMS We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv01322
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: KATHLEEN ADAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
HIGGINS v. PATENAUDE & FELIX, A.P.C. et al
as 2:2010cv00577
Plaintiff: VICKI L. HIGGINS
Defendant: PATENAUDE & FELIX, A.P.C., GREGG L. MORRIS, TARGET NATIONAL BANK and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
ADAMS v. BLATT, HASENMILLER, LEIBSKER & MOORE LLC
as 3:2009cv00273
Plaintiff: MARY ELLEN ADAMS
Defendant: BLATT, HASENMILLER, LEIBSKER & MOORE LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Type: Other Statutes Both
MARKS v. NOVAK et al
as 2:2008cv00326
Plaintiff: ADAM A. MARKS
Defendant: PAUL NOVAK and UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?