Contract Cases filed in the US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Cases 11 - 17 of 17
COULTER v. LINDSAY et al
as 2:2015cv00289
Plaintiff: JEAN COULTER
Defendant: ALEXANDER H. LINDSAY, JR., LINDSAY LAW FIRM, JOSEPH VICTOR CHARLTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SCYOC et al v. EQUITRANS, L.P. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2013cv01735
Plaintiff: RANDAL L. VAN SCYOC , CHARLENE S. VAN SCYOC , CAREN COLLEEN LEMLEY and others
Defendant: EQUITRANS, L.P. , EQT PRODUCTION COMPANY , LAWRENCE H. MILLER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
T.H.E. INSURANCE COMPANY v. MARTIN et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2011cv00254
Plaintiff: T.H.E. INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant: JAMES D. MARTIN , TIMOTHY W. DOBRZYNSKI , COLLEEN A. DOBRZYNSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Type: Contract Insurance
MATHIESON v. MATHIESON We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv01158
Plaintiff: JAMES ALEXANDER MATHIESON
Defendant: EVELYN THERESA MATHIESON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ALPERN ROSENTHAL P.C. v. RANGOS
as 2:2009cv01423
Plaintiff: ALPERN ROSENTHAL P.C.
Defendant: ALEXANDER W. RANGOS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Type: Contract None
STATE AUTO MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. MCCUTCHEON et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2008cv00350
Plaintiff: STATE AUTO MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant: J. ROBERT MCCUTCHEON, WILLIAM ALEXANDER and JOYCE STEINER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
Type: Contract Insurance
ALEXANDER et al v. UNITED STATES OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT
as 2:2008cv00237
Plaintiff: JAMES B. ALEXANDER and TRUDY ALEXANDER
Defendant: UNITED STATES OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT
Cause Of Action: 5 U.S.C. § 8901 Federal Employees Health Benefits Act
Type: Contract Insurance

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?