Cases 11 - 20 of 23
DINAPLES v. MRS BPO, LLC et al
as 2:2015cv01435
Plaintiff:
DONNA DINAPLES
Defendant:
MRS BPO, LLC and JOHN DOES 1-25
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
HARTMAN v. MONARCH RECOVERY MANAGEMENT, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv01364
Plaintiff:
MELISSA HARTMAN
Defendant:
MONARCH RECOVERY MANAGEMENT, INC. and JOHN DOES 1-25
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
PANICHELLA v. UNITED COLLECTION BUREAU, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv01304
Plaintiff:
DANIEL H. PANICHELLA
Defendant:
UNITED COLLECTION BUREAU, INC. and DOES 1-25
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
KRILL v. FIRST NATIONAL COLLECTION BUREAU, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv01292
Plaintiff:
THEODORE E. KRILL
Defendant:
FIRST NATIONAL COLLECTION BUREAU, INC. and JOHN DOES 1-25
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
DINAPLES v. PHILLIPS & COHEN ASSOCIATES, LTD. et al
as 2:2015cv01249
Plaintiff:
DONNA DINAPLES
Defendant:
PHILLIPS & COHEN ASSOCIATES, LTD. and JOHN DOES 1-25
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
KRILL v. TOTAL CARD, INC et al
as 2:2015cv01207
Plaintiff:
THEODORE E. KRILL
Defendant:
TOTAL CARD, INC and JOHN DOES 1-25
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
SULLIVAN v. FIRST NATIONAL COLLECTION BUREAU, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv01212
Plaintiff:
LUKE J. SULLIVAN
Defendant:
FIRST NATIONAL COLLECTION BUREAU, INC., LVNV FUNDING, LLC and JOHN DOES 1-25
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
POPE v. CAVALRY PORTFOLIO SERVICES, LLC et al
as 2:2015cv01185
Plaintiff:
KAREN POPE
Defendant:
CAVALRY PORTFOLIO SERVICES, LLC , CAVALRY SPV I, LLC and JOHN DOES 1-25
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
DINAPLES v. FINANCIAL RECOVERY SERVICES, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv01121
Plaintiff:
DONNA DINAPLES
Defendant:
FINANCIAL RECOVERY SERVICES, INC. and JOHN DOES 1-25
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
GILMORE v. CHASE RECEIVABLES et al
as 2:2015cv01114
Plaintiff:
VIRGINIA GILMORE
Defendant:
CHASE RECEIVABLES and JOHN DOES 1-25
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
