Cases 41 - 49 of 49
HIGGINS v. PATENAUDE & FELIX, A.P.C. et al
as 2:2011cv00521
Plaintiff:
VICKI L. HIGGINS
Defendant:
TARGET NATIONAL BANK, N.A. , ADAM GRIM , JANICE L. LOKEN and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ADAMS
as 2:2010cv01322
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
KATHLEEN ADAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00224
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
HIGGINS v. PATENAUDE & FELIX, A.P.C. et al
as 2:2010cv00577
Plaintiff:
VICKI L. HIGGINS
Defendant:
PATENAUDE & FELIX, A.P.C., GREGG L. MORRIS, TARGET NATIONAL BANK and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
CHAPMAN v. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT et al
as 2:2010cv00088
Plaintiff:
J. TODD CHAPMAN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT, EDWARD G. RENDELL, THOMAS CORBETT and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
ADAMS v. BLATT, HASENMILLER, LEIBSKER & MOORE LLC
as 3:2009cv00273
Plaintiff:
MARY ELLEN ADAMS
Defendant:
BLATT, HASENMILLER, LEIBSKER & MOORE LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
HICKTON et al v. ENTERPRISE RENT-A-CAR COMPANY, INC et al
as 2:2009mc00210
Defendant:
ENTERPRISE HOLDINGS, INC., ENTERPRISE LEASING COMPANY OF PHILADELPHIA, LLC, ENTERPRISE RENT-A-CAR COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
NICKOLAS C. HICKTON, ELSA DEPINA, JEFFREY GALIA and others
GIANT EAGLE, INC. v. THE HERSHEYCOMPANY et al
as 2:2008cv00414
Plaintiff:
GIANT EAGLE, INC.
Defendant:
THE HERSHEY COMPANY, HERSHEY CANADA INC., MARS CANADA INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
MARKS v. NOVAK et al
as 2:2008cv00326
Plaintiff:
ADAM A. MARKS
Defendant:
PAUL NOVAK and UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
