Cases 21 - 30 of 52
JENKS v. H&R BLOCK EASTERN ENTERPRISES, INC.
as 2:2016cv01388
Plaintiff:
JAMAL H. JENKS
Defendant:
H&R BLOCK EASTERN ENTERPRISES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
PEIFER v. TMK-IPSCO
as 2:2016cv01381
Plaintiff:
DALE H. PEIFER
Defendant:
TMK-IPSCO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
LINDEN v. NAVISTAR INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION et al
as 2:2016cv01309
Plaintiff:
MARK H. LINDEN
Defendant:
NAVISTAR INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION and NAVISTAR, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BABER v. WARD TRUCKING, LLC et al
as 3:2016cv00109
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM BABER
Defendant:
WARD TRUCKING, LLC and RONALD H. WHISMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SHERMAN v. RIAR et al
as 2:2015cv00444
Plaintiff:
SCOTT A. SHERMAN
Defendant:
SANDEEP S. RIAR, M.D. , RANDALL STIGILANO, D.O. , STIGLIANO FAMILY PRACTICE, P.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PURDY v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIFF et al
as 1:2014cv00188
Plaintiff:
RONNIE H. PURDY, SR.
Defendant:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIFF and OTSUKA AMERICA PHARMACEUTICAL INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BELL et al v. JELD-WEN, INC. et al
as 1:2013cv00372
Plaintiff:
JOHN H. BELL and CONSTANCE F. BELL
Defendant:
JELD-WEN, INC. and HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GRACE v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, L.P.
as 2:2013cv01471
Plaintiff:
GLEN H. GRACE
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
THOMAS E. LACHKOVICH v. BUSH et al
as 1:2013cv00089
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and THOMAS E. LACHKOVICH
Defendant:
GEORGE W. BUSH, MARK SULLIVAN, RICHARD CHENEY and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
MILLER et al v. U.S. CONTINENTAL MARKETING, INC. et al
as 2:2012cv01282
Plaintiff:
MAXINE H. MILLER and DONALD E. MILLER
Defendant:
U.S. CONTINENTAL MARKETING, INC. and PAYLESS SHOESOURCE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
