Cases 31 - 38 of 38
WEDEL v. HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC.
as 2:2011cv01100
Plaintiff:
JOHN WEDEL
Defendant:
HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
BAUM et al v. THE BLACK & DECKER CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv00271
Plaintiff:
RANDY BAUM and PATRICIA BAUM
Defendant:
BLACK & DECKER (U.S.) INC. and HOME DEPOT, U.S.A., INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LYNN et al v. YAMAHA GOLF-CAR COMPANY et al
as 2:2010cv01059
Plaintiff:
MERCEDEZ LYNN , MELISSA LYNN and ROBERT LYNN
Defendant:
YAMAHA GOLF-CAR COMPANY , YAMAHA MOTOR MANUFACTURING CORPORATION , YAMAHA MOTOR MANUFACTURING CORPORATION OF AMERICA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
GEDID v. TOYOTA MOTOR CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv00407
Plaintiff:
MITCHELL P. GEDID
Defendant:
TOYOTA MOTOR CORPORATION, TOYOTA MOTOR SALES, U.S.A., INC. and TOYOTA MOTOR ENGINEERING & MANUFACTURING NORTH AMERICA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
ROBISON et al v. THE HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC.
as 1:2010cv00056
Plaintiff:
DAVID N. ROBISON and MARY PAT ROBISON
Defendant:
THE HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
ORCHARD et al v. YAMAHA MOTOR CORPORATION, U.S.A. et al
as 2:2010cv00053
Plaintiff:
GILBERT ORCHARD, III and CORINNE ORCHARD
Defendant:
YAMAHA MOTOR CORPORATION, U.S.A., YAMAHA MOTOR CORPORATION, U.S.A., YAMAHA MOTOR MANUFACTURING CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
STRUEVE v. HOME DEPOT, U.S.A., INC. et al
as 2:2009cv00925
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM STRUEVE
Defendant:
HOME DEPOT, U.S.A., INC. and HOME DEPOT, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
ELMES v. TOYOTA MOTOR MANUFACTURING, KENTUCKY, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv01300
Plaintiff:
ROBERT ELMES
Defendant:
TOYOTA MOTOR MANUFACTURING, KENTUCKY, INC., TOYOTA MOTOR ENGINEERING & MANUFACTURING NORTH AMERICA, INC. and TOYOTA MOTOR SALES U.S.A., INC.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
