Cases 41 - 50 of 67
RUDOLPH v. BABAZ
as 2:2013cv00408
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE P. RUDOLPH
Defendant:
PAUL BABAZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel, Assault, Slander
SCOTT v. BURKE et al
as 2:2013cv00278
Plaintiff:
ROBERT C. SCOTT, JR.
Defendant:
THOMAS P. BURKE and UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Wrongful Death
RUDOLPH v. SAFARI CLUB INTERNATIONAL
as 2:2012cv01710
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE P. RUDOLPH
Defendant:
SAFARI CLUB INTERNATIONAL , RALPH CUNNINGHAM , LARRY HIGGINS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel, Assault, Slander
LIVENGOOD et al v. BASHORE et al
as 2:2012cv01074
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE LIVENGOOD and GERALD P. LIVENGOOD
Defendant:
JAMES BASHORE, JR., J&B LEASING INCORPORATED and RONALD W. JACQUESS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
SELL et al v. SMITH & NEPHEW, INC. et al
as 1:2012cv00050
Plaintiff:
BETTY P. SELL and RONALD SELL
Defendant:
SMITH & NEPHEW, INC. and SMITH & NEPHEW AHP, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GILLETTE v. MISTER P. EXPRESS, INC. et al
as 3:2011cv00241
Plaintiff:
JOHN F. GILLETTE
Defendant:
MISTER P. EXPRESS, INC. and MICHELLE B. DUERR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LAUGHNER v. SZYMANSKI
as 1:2011cv00146
Plaintiff:
LAURIE LAUGHNER
Defendant:
MICHAEL P. SZYMANSKI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MOSKES et al v. YOUNGDAHL et al
as 2:2011cv00733
Plaintiff:
SEAN P. MOSKES and JENNIFER L. MOSKES
Defendant:
PAULA SUN YOUNGDAHL, TRI-STATE OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, INC., HERITAGE VALLEY BEAVER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SALVIO v. AMGEN, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv00553
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN P. SALVIO
Defendant:
AMGEN, INC. , IMMUNEX, INC. , WYETH, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GEDID v. ACE CASH EXPRESS, INC
as 2:2011cv00067
Plaintiff:
MITCHELL P. GEDID
Defendant:
ACE CASH EXPRESS, INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
