Labor Cases filed in the US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
SU v. INDEPENDENCE CARE OF PITTSBURGH LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00681
Plaintiff: JULIE A SU
Defendant: INDEPENDENCE CARE OF PITTSBURGH and MAXWELL TROIANO
SU v. LIM PR CLEANING SERVICES et al
as 2:2024mc00214
Respondent: JUAN E. ALONSO, LIM PR CLEANING SERVICES and ALONSO PACHECO
Petitioner: JULIE A. SU
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
SU v. TRINKLEY et al
as 2:2024mc00195
Petitioner: JULIE A SU
Respondent: MICHAEL TRINKLEY, TIMOTHY BARKLEY and ETHAN SIMMONS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 651 Occupational Safety/Health
Type: Labor Labor: Other
SU v. RIVERSEDGE ADVANCED RETIREMENT SOLUTIONS, LLC. et al
as 2:2024cv00104
Plaintiff: JULIE A. SU
Defendant: RIVERSEDGE ADVANCED RETIREMENT SOLUTIONS, LLC., PAUL PALGUTA, MID ATLANTIC TRUST COMPANY a corporation doing business as AMERICAN TRUST COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
SU v. MCKISSICK et al
as 2:2024mc00180
Petitioner: JULIE A. SU
Respondent: EDWARD MCKISSICK, CHAD WISSINGER and RONALD MAHAN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 651 Occupational Safety/Health
Type: Labor Labor: Other
SU v. IKAROS GOURMET COMPANY et al
as 2:2023cv01703
Plaintiff: JULIE A. SU
Defendant: IKAROS GOURMET COMPANY doing business as IKAROS GOURMET CO. INC. doing business as SIMON'S FOOD CONCESSIONS and SIMEON KOUTOUFARIS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
STEWART v. GAUDIN We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv01094
Plaintiff: R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA, EUGENE SCALIA, MILTON AL STEWART and others
Defendant: HOLLAND ACQUISITIONS, INC. a corporation doing business as HOLLAND SERVICES and BRYAN GAUDIN individually, and as a Corporate Officer of HOLLAND ACQUISITIONS, INC., D/B/A HOLLAND SERVICES
Intervenor Defendant: ROBERT GAUDIN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?