Cases 21 - 30 of 64
Bromley et al v. TAYLOR, PIGUE, MARCHETTI & BLAIR, PLLC (TV2)
as 3:2015cv00453
Plaintiff:
Michael S Bromley and Susan P Bromley
Defendant:
TAYLOR, PIGUE, MARCHETTI & BLAIR, PLLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
White v. McIntyre et al
as 3:2015cv00089
Plaintiff:
George White
Defendant:
James P McIntyre, Jr and Knox County Board of Education
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Auchard et al v. Tennessee Valley Authority (TV1)
as 3:2009cv00054
Plaintiff:
Linda Elaine Barnes, Robert Gajewski, Frank Balzer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Schmidt et al (TV2)
as 3:2014mc00013
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Lawrence P Schmidt, Futuregen Company, Commercial Equity Partners, LTD and others
Starnes v. Asset Acceptance, LLC (TV3)
as 3:2014cv00297
Plaintiff:
Edward P Starnes
Defendant:
Asset Acceptance, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Dickerson v. CBET, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv00174
Plaintiff:
Sandra H Dickerson
Defendant:
CBET, Inc. , Healthstar Physicians, P C and Lauren A Carroll
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Buck Creek Ventures, LLC v. Fowlers Holding LLLP et al
as 3:2014mc00005
Plaintiff:
Buck Creek Ventures, LLC
Defendant:
Fowlers Holding LLLP, Fowlers Furniture, Inc. and Donald P Fowler
Canfield v. P&B Capital Group LLC et al
as 3:2012cv00400
Plaintiff:
Sherry Canfield
Defendant:
P&B Capital Group LLC, Jacob Law Group, PLLC and Adam R. Kazmark
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Alston-Jones v. Pridgen et al
as 1:2012mc00025
Plaintiff:
Anna-Maria Alston-Jones
Defendant:
John C. Pridgen, Robert Chasteen, T. Christopher Hughes and others
Nash v. The Law Office of John P. Frye, P.C. et al (TV1)
as 3:2012cv00256
Plaintiff:
Susan Nash
Defendant:
The Law Office of John P. Frye, P.C. and Atlantic Credit & Finance, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
