Cases 31 - 40 of 65
Cosper v. United States of America (PLR1)
as 1:2016cv00320
Plaintiff:
Jimmy D Cosper
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Eatmon et al v. United States of America (JRG2)
as 2:2016cv00150
Plaintiff:
John Cleveland Eatmon and Julia Carolyn Eatmon
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Gillick v. United States of America
as 2:2016cv00012
Plaintiff:
Dan Gillick
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Evans v. United States of America et al (PLR1)
as 3:2015cv00464
Plaintiff:
Suzan Evans
Defendant:
United States of America and Federal Bureau of Investigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Hixson et al v. Bradley et al (TV2)
as 3:2015cv00271
Plaintiff:
Holly Hixson and Laura Jo Hixson
Defendant:
John E Bradley , United States Post Office and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Collins v. United States of America (JRG2)
as 2:2015cv00173
Plaintiff:
Thomas Virgil Collins
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Lambert v. United States of America et al (PLR2)
as 3:2015cv00241
Plaintiff:
Richard L. Lambert
Defendant:
United States of America , Eric Holder , Robert S Mueller, III and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Crawford v. McCutcheon et al
as 1:2015cv00135
Plaintiff:
Thomas Edward Crawford
Defendant:
Hamilton County Sheriff's Office , Mickey C. Roundtree , Mark Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Kennerly v. United States of America
as 4:2014cv00068
Plaintiff:
Billy R Kennerly
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Lajas et al v. United States of America et al
as 1:2014cv00081
Plaintiff:
Joel Lajas and Damaris Lajas
Defendant:
United States of America and United States Department of Health and Human Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
