Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Sullivan v. C R Bard Inc et al
as 1:2020cv00247
Defendant:
Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated, McKesson Corporation, C R Bard Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Whitson v. Ethicon, Inc. et al (JRG2)
as 3:2020cv00282
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., C. R. Bard, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
Emily Whitson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Long v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al (TV1)
as 1:2020cv00085
Plaintiff:
Arnold Steve Long, JR
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cunningham v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00008
Plaintiff:
Patsy Cunningham
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Tissue Science Laboratories Limited, C. R. Bard, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bowling v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 4:2017cv00019
Plaintiff:
Bessie Bowling
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Moore v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al (TWP1)
as 1:2016cv00161
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Moore
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00228
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McLeod v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00227
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, American Medical Systems, Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Linda F McLeod
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ellison et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 3:2008cv00098
Plaintiff:
Linda Ellison, Linda Ellison, Elaine Beeler and others
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc., C. R. Bard, Inc., Davol, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Ware et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 1:2007cv00172
Plaintiff:
Carmen Y Ware and Gerald L Ware
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
