Cases 41 - 50 of 136
Fowler v. Johnson & Johnson et al (JRG1)
as 3:2017cv00410
Plaintiff:
Karol Fowler
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson , Johnson & Johnson Consumer Companies, Inc. and Imerys Talc America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rhynehart v. Ethicon, Inc. et al (PLR1)
as 3:2017cv00349
Plaintiff:
Penny Rhynehart
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Allmon v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv00351
Plaintiff:
Mary Allmon
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Haddon v. Johnson & Johnson et al (JRG1)
as 4:2017cv00040
Plaintiff:
Judy Haddon
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nichols v. Johnson & Johnson et al (TV3)
as 1:2017cv00137
Plaintiff:
Carla Nichols
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Walker v. Johnson & Johnson et al (JRG2)
as 1:2017cv00087
Plaintiff:
Donnie Walker
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson , Johnson & Johnson Consumer, Inc. , Imerys Talc American, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Melinda Burgner et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00025
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
Melinda Burgner and Douglas Burgner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Hilliard et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al (TV1)
as 1:2017cv00008
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Sue Hilliard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Ryan v. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv00407
Plaintiff:
Veronica Ryan
Defendant:
Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson Company , Janssen Ortho LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
George v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 3:2016cv00564
Plaintiff:
Kristopher George
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Johnson & Johnson Consumer Companies, Inc. and Imerys Talc America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
