Cases 31 - 40 of 1,562
Watson v. Fitz
as 3:2023cv00919
Petitioner:
Jamarces J. Watson
Respondent:
West Tennessee State Penitentiary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Coley v. Watwood
as 3:2023cv00883
Petitioner:
William Coley
Respondent:
Brandon Watwood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chatman, Sr. v. State of Indiana, The et al
as 3:2023cv00968
Petitioner:
Albert D.M. Chatman, Sr.
Respondent:
State of Indiana, The, (f/n/u) Reddman, (f/n/u) Olmstead and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Carter v. Holloway
as 3:2023cv00780
Petitioner:
Eric O. Carter
Respondent:
James Holloway
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dobson v. Eller
as 3:2023cv00760
Petitioner:
Mark Dobson
Respondent:
Brian Eller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Steed v. Fitz
as 3:2023cv00816
Petitioner:
Reginold C. Steed
Respondent:
Johnny Fitz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dodson v. Rhoades
as 3:2023cv00754
Petitioner:
Christopher James Dodson
Defendant:
Shawn Phillips
Respondent:
Sheriff Dusty Rhoades
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Odom, Jr v. State of Tennessee
as 3:2023cv00679
Petitioner:
Melvin A. Odom, Jr
Respondent:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Neal v. State of Tennessee
as 2:2023cv00039
Plaintiff:
Terry Neal
Defendant:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harris v. Phillips
as 3:2023cv00799
Petitioner:
Ricky Harris
Respondent:
Shawn Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
