Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Pierce v. Correct Care et al
as 3:2017cv01322
Plaintiff:
Cornelius Pierce
Defendant:
Correct Care, (f/n/u) Bridges, Core Civic and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith et al v. Maury County et al
as 1:2017cv00070
Plaintiff:
Harold M. Smith and Keith Pierce
Defendant:
Maury County and Maury County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lankford v. Tennessee Department of Correction
as 3:2016cv03289
Plaintiff:
John Pierce Lankford
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Correction
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pierce v. Rutherford County et al
as 3:2016cv02262
Plaintiff:
Cornelius Deauntai Pierce
Defendant:
Rutherford County, Robert Arnold, Medical Provider of Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lyle v. Montgomery County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2016cv00864
Plaintiff:
Robert Douglas Lyle
Defendant:
Montgomery County, Tennessee, ABL Food Service, f/n/u Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lankford v. City of Hendersonville, Tennessee et al
as 3:2015cv00556
Plaintiff:
John Pierce Lankford
Defendant:
City of Hendersonville, Tennessee, Micky Miller, R. Abel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lankford v. City of Hendersonville, Tennessee et al
as 3:2015cv00512
Plaintiff:
John Pierce Lankford
Defendant:
City of Hendersonville, Tennessee, Hendersonville Police Department, R. Abel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peirce v. Maury County Sheriff and Jail
as 1:2014cv00034
Plaintiff:
Keith Pierce
Defendant:
Maury County Sheriff and Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nelson v. Hardeman County Corrections et al
as 3:2013cv01192
Plaintiff:
Oswald M. Nelson
Defendant:
Trainmem and Mental Health Provider, f/n/u Henson, f/nu Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hunter v. Williams et al
as 3:2013cv00592
Plaintiff:
Stephen L. Hunter
Defendant:
(f/n/u) Williams and (f/n/u) Pierce
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
