Cases 41 - 50 of 79
Nunley v. Rausch
as 3:2023cv00100
Plaintiff:
Jack Nunley
Defendant:
David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Doe #14 v. Lee et al
as 3:2022cv01075
Plaintiff:
John Doe #14
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Court of General Sessions of Davidson County, The et al v. Phillips El
as 3:2022cv00956
Plaintiff:
Court of General Sessions of Davidson County, The, State of Tennessee, J. Parker and others
Defendant:
Jonah Phillips El
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
Doe #13 v. Lee et al
as 3:2022cv00831
Plaintiff:
John Doe #13
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Doe #12 v. Lee et al
as 3:2022cv00712
Plaintiff:
John Doe #12
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brantley v. Kaplan et al
as 3:2022cv00541
Plaintiff:
Derrick Brantley
Defendant:
Robert S. Kaplan and Eric Rosengren
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Doe v. Lee et al
as 3:2022cv00373
Plaintiff:
John Doe and Curtis Randall Hodges
Defendant:
William Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe #11 v. Lee et al
as 3:2022cv00338
Plaintiff:
John Doe #11
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Collins et al v. State of Tennessee et al
as 3:2022cv00225
Plaintiff:
Barbra Collins, Amy C. Dudley and Donald J. Sobery
Defendant:
State of Tennessee and Tre Hargett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Doe v. Lee et al
as 2:2022cv00012
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
