Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Adams et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 3:2021cv00435
Plaintiff:
Patrice McCaulley, Debra Bales, Philip Spence and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00125
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Cunningham v. Robertson et al
as 3:2014cv01277
Plaintiff:
Craig Cunningham
Defendant:
Kyle Robertson, Healing Group Consultants, Ivan Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0252
Crockett v. Satterlee et al
as 3:2013mc00068
Plaintiff:
Antonio M. Crockett
Defendant:
Scott Satterlee, Brandon Robertson and Corey Toney
In Re: Notices of Lis Pendens Filed by the United States of America (Real Property in Robertson County, Tennessee, owned by Bart Posey and wife, Angela S. Posey)
as 3:2011mc00005
Defendant:
Notices of Lis Pendens Filed by the United States of America (Real Property in Robertson County, Tennessee, owned by Bart Posey and wife, Angela S. Posey)
Petitioner:
Bart Posey
Clifton v. Bredesen et al
as 3:2011mc00001
Plaintiff:
Terry Lee Clifton
Defendant:
Phil Bredesen, Robert Bob Cooper, Gayle Ray and others
Elam et al v. Sorey et al
as 3:2009cv00582
Plaintiff:
Linda C. Elam, Linda C. Elam, Randy E. Robertson and others
Defendant:
Christopher V. Sorey and Smyrna/Rutherford County Airport Authority
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ellis v. Burr et al
as 3:2009mc00122
Plaintiff:
Derrick E. Ellis
Defendant:
Jacqueline A. Burr, Wendy J. Davis, Michelle Waynick and others
Ellis v. Bollinger et al
as 3:2008mc00271
Plaintiff:
Derrick E. Ellis
Defendant:
Gene Bollinger, Jerrell Jones, John Holt and others
Lee v. Robertson County Jail et al
as 3:2008mc00252
Plaintiff:
James Jr. Lee
Defendant:
Robertson County Jail, (f/n/u) Butner, (f/n/u) Young and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
