Cases 11 - 20 of 27
Patterson v. Core Civic et al
as 3:2017cv01409
Plaintiff:
Rodney T. Patterson
Defendant:
Core Civic, Damon Hinniger, Blair Liebach and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pierce v. Correct Care et al
as 3:2017cv01322
Plaintiff:
Cornelius Pierce
Defendant:
Correct Care, (f/n/u) Bridges, Core Civic and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith et al v. Maury County et al
as 1:2017cv00070
Plaintiff:
Harold M. Smith and Keith Pierce
Defendant:
Maury County and Maury County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lankford v. Tennessee Department of Correction
as 3:2016cv03289
Plaintiff:
John Pierce Lankford
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Correction
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pierce v. Rutherford County et al
as 3:2016cv02262
Plaintiff:
Cornelius Deauntai Pierce
Defendant:
Rutherford County, Robert Arnold, Medical Provider of Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lyle v. Montgomery County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2016cv00864
Plaintiff:
Robert Douglas Lyle
Defendant:
Montgomery County, Tennessee, ABL Food Service, f/n/u Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lankford v. City of Hendersonville, Tennessee et al
as 3:2015cv00556
Plaintiff:
John Pierce Lankford
Defendant:
City of Hendersonville, Tennessee, Micky Miller, R. Abel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lankford v. City of Hendersonville, Tennessee et al
as 3:2015cv00512
Plaintiff:
John Pierce Lankford
Defendant:
City of Hendersonville, Tennessee, Hendersonville Police Department, R. Abel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lankford v. The Attorney General of the State of Tennessee
as 3:2014cv02312
Petitioner:
John Pierce Lankford
Respondent:
The Attorney General of the State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lankford v. The State of Tennessee 18th Judicial District of Sumner Co. at Gallatin 37066
as 3:2014cv02320
Petitioner:
John Pierce Lankford
Respondent:
Sonny Weatherford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
