Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
Cases 11 - 20 of 1,382
Hurst v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00885
Defendant: John Doe #1 and Amber L. Phillips
Plaintiff: Vanessa Hurst
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods v. Tidwell et al
as 3:2024cv00887
Defendant: Judge Barry Tidwell, John Zimmerman and Harold Scott Saul
Plaintiff: Donnavan M. Woods
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gayles v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00879
Plaintiff: James Gayles
Defendant: John Doe #1 and Amber L. Phillips
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mays v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv00876
Petitioner: John Allen Mays
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00862
Unknown: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Ford v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00858
Plaintiff: William Ford
Defendant: John Doe #1 and Amber Phillips
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nelson v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00839
Defendant: Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Plaintiff: Tina Nelson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hodges v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00840
Defendant: Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Plaintiff: Kena Hodges
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bradley Jr v. Rudd Medical Services et al
as 3:2024cv00827
Defendant: Charles Fynn, John Rudd and Rudd Medical Services
Plaintiff: Randolph Bradley Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCollum v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00809
Defendant: John Doe #1 and Amber L. Phillips
Plaintiff: Heather McCollum
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?