Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Stevenson v. Frink
as 1:2022cv00021
Petitioner: James Dominic Stevenson
Respondent: Warden Martin Frink
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rochester et al v. K.H. Sharp et al
as 3:2015cv00730
Petitioner: Julian E. Rochester
Respondent: K.H. Sharp, R.B. Harwell, K.F. McDonald and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Rodriguez v. Nixon
as 3:2015cv00718
Petitioner: Luis Alberto Rodriguez
Respondent: Stevenson L. Nixon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pearson v. Mooris et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2015cv00578
Plaintiff: Rashunus Pearson
Defendant: Mindy Mooris, Martesha Johnson, Jamaal Boykin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rochester v. Stevenson et al
as 3:2015cv00372
Plaintiff: Julian E. Rochester
Defendant: R. Stevenson, B. Stirling, State S.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Rochester v. Federal Prison Director et al
as 3:2015cv00342
Plaintiff: Julian E. Rochester
Defendant: Federal Prison Director, U. S. Atty. Gen., W. N. Nettles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Raybon-Tate v. Schofield et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2015cv00322
Plaintiff: Tyler Fitzgerald Raybon-Tate
Defendant: Derrick Schofield, Tony Parker, Stevenson Nixon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rochester v. Harwell et al
as 3:2015cv00308
Plaintiff: Julian E. Rochester
Defendant: R.B. Harwell, K.F. McDonald, J. M. Childs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rochester v. Stevenson et al
as 3:2015cv00117
Petitioner: Julian E. Rochester
Respondent: R. Stevenson and U.S. Gov.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Hodge v. Nixon
as 3:2014cv02322
Petitioner: Marcus G. Hodge
Respondent: Stevenson Nixon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?