Cases 71 - 80 of 119
Brown v. Stephens et al
as 3:2012cv00674
Plaintiff:
Tyris Brown
Defendant:
Melinda Stephens, Jessica Isom, Glenn Alexander and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brooks v. Davidson County Sheriff Office et al
as 3:2012cv00438
Plaintiff:
Jeffery A. Brooks
Defendant:
Davidson County Sheriff Office and Correct Care Solution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Hall et al
as 3:2012cv00436
Plaintiff:
Ronald Lynn Jones
Defendant:
Daron Hall, Davidson County Sheriff's Office and Correct Care Solutions
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mansour El-Amin v. Correct Care Solutions et al
as 3:2012cv00416
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions, f/n/u Stewart and M. Stephens
Plaintiff:
Mansour Bin El-Amin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitefield v. Correct Care Solutions et al
as 3:2012cv00402
Plaintiff:
Terry Richard Whitefield
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions, Davidson County Sheriff's Office and Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Correct Care, Inc. v. Patients' Choice Medical Center of Erin, TN, LLC
as 3:2012cv00131
Plaintiff:
Correct Care, Inc.
Defendant:
Patients' Choice Medical Center of Erin, TN, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Patton v. Correct Care Solutions et al
as 3:2012mc00009
Plaintiff:
Jerry L. Patton
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions, Darron Hall, (f/n/u) Logan and others
Thompson v. Hall et al
as 3:2011cv01232
Plaintiff:
Ray N. Thompson
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions and John Doe 4
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thacker v. Correct Care Solutions
as 3:2011cv00946
Plaintiff:
Samuel L. Thacker
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chatman v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County et al
as 3:2011cv00652
Plaintiff:
William R. Chatman, Jr.
Defendant:
Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County and Correct Care Solutions
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
