Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Simmons v. McKay et al
as 3:2018cv00121
Plaintiff:
Freddie H. Simmons, Jr.
Defendant:
Scotty McKay, Catlin Lynch, Steve Blount and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Choate v. Putnam County Sheriff's Dept.
as 2:2016cv00057
Plaintiff:
Derrick Justin Choate
Defendant:
Putnam County Sheriff's Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Salada v. Putnam County Sheriff's Dept. et al
as 2:2016cv00032
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Salada
Defendant:
Putnam County Sheriff's Dept., Jamie Emmerton, Southern Health Practices and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Loftis v. Putnam County Sheriff's Dept.
as 2:2016cv00029
Plaintiff:
Larry T. Loftis
Defendant:
Putnam County Sheriff's Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Huff v. Putnam County Sheriff's Dept. et al
as 2:2016cv00028
Plaintiff:
Rodney Ray Huff
Defendant:
Putnam County Sheriff's Dept. and Jamie Emmerton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rollings v. Sequatchie County Sheriff's Dept. et al
as 3:2016cv00091
Plaintiff:
Julian P. Rollings
Defendant:
Sequatchie County Sheriff's Dept. and Sequatchie County Justice Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Franklin v. Bean et al
as 3:2015cv01063
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Jason Franklin
Defendant:
Tony Bean and Grundy County Sheriff's Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edwards v. State of Tennessee et al
as 3:2015cv00273
Plaintiff:
Randy Edwards
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, District Attorney General-Bradley County TN and Bradley County Sheriff's Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Merrell et al v. Bedford County Sheriff's Dept. et al
as 3:2014cv02014
Plaintiff:
Bobby Jerome Merrell and Isaac Scott Blanton
Defendant:
Bedford County Sheriff's Dept., Austin Swing, Bedford County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Russo v. Bedford County Sheriff's Dept. et al
as 3:2014cv02004
Plaintiff:
Jason L. Russo
Defendant:
Bedford County Sheriff's Dept., Austin Swing, Bedford County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
