Cases 11 - 20 of 1,520
Settle v. Vantell
as 1:2024cv01060
Petitioner:
Mike Settle
Defendant:
Vince Vantell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Taylor v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv02037
Petitioner:
Derrick Taylor
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Perry v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv01051
Petitioner:
Cordetrick Montrelle Perry
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Perkins v. State of Tennessee
as 1:2024cv01023
Petitioner:
Andre Perkins
Respondent:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pankey v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv01011
Petitioner:
Jaycent Pankey
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Oruade v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv02023
Petitioner:
Caesar Oruade
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Meehan v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv02110
Petitioner:
Shaun Meehan
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Brooks v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv02751
Petitioner:
Unique Brooks
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Brooks v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv02753
Petitioner:
Phillip Brooks
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Alford v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv02759
Petitioner:
Arthur Alford, III
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
