Cases 111 - 120 of 2,184
Hunter v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv02188
Petitioner:
Steven L. Hunter
Respondent:
United States of America and Warden Bowers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Bricco v. State of TN
as 2:2023cv02161
Petitioner:
Michael L. Bricco
Respondent:
State of TN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vaughn v. Mays
as 1:2023cv01036
Petitioner:
Harold Allen Vaughn
Respondent:
Tony Mays
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. State of TN
as 2:2023cv02104
Petitioner:
Glenn Vernell Smith
Respondent:
State of TN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Turner v. Tennessee Dept. of Corrections (Northwest Correctional Complex)
as 2:2023cv02075
Petitioner:
Rodney V. Turner
Respondent:
Tennessee Dept. of Corrections (Northwest Correctional Complex) and Sharon N. Rose
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Holcomb v. Bowers et al
as 2:2023cv02074
Petitioner:
George Noah Holcomb, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden Bowers and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Sharp v. Phillips
as 2:2023cv02062
Petitioner:
Sharrad Sharp
Respondent:
Shawn Phillips and Jerry Wardlow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rogers v. Lemaster
as 1:2023cv01026
Petitioner:
Hrondy Tarvus Rogers
Respondent:
Warden David Lemaster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Childers v. Bowers
as 2:2023cv02056
Petitioner:
Gary J. Childers
Respondent:
Warden Bowers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Pelletier v. Bowers
as 2:2023cv02044
Petitioner:
Robert J Pelletier
Respondent:
Warden-FCI Bowers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
