Cases 1 - 10 of 43
Perry v. Shelby County Criminal Justice Center Prosecutor's Office et al
as 2:2023cv02762
Petitioner:
Courtney Perry
Respondent:
Shelby County Criminal Justice Center Prosecutor's Office, Debbie Nichols, Bill Odom and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ibrihim v. United States Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2023cv02509
Petitioner:
Siraj Ibrihim and Robert Crain
Respondent:
United States Bureau of Prisons and John Doe of United States Marshals Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jones v. United States of America
as 2:2022cv02645
Petitioner:
John Jones
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Becton v. Frink et al
as 2:2022cv02534
Petitioner:
Xavier Becton and Abdul Akhir
Respondent:
Warden Frink, Amy Weirich, John Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jordan v. Bowers
as 2:2022cv02526
Petitioner:
John Lee Jordan
Respondent:
Freddie Bowers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Via v. Mehr
as 1:2022cv01172
Petitioner:
Dustin Blake Via
Defendant:
Sheriff John Mehr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Brent v. Vantell
as 1:2022cv01005
Petitioner:
John Brent
Respondent:
Vinnie Vantell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fowler v. Yates
as 1:2021cv01165
Petitioner:
Kenny Fowler
Respondent:
Warden John Yates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Newell v. Warden FCI Memphis
as 2:2021cv02513
Petitioner:
John Wesley Newell
Respondent:
Warden FCI Memphis and A.W. Childress
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Stitts v. Boyd
as 1:2020cv01281
Petitioner:
Michael John Stitts
Respondent:
Bert Boyd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
