Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Erby v. State of Tenn. et al
as 2:2023cv02240
Plaintiff:
Richard Erby
Defendant:
State of Tenn., Shelby County, Lee Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tims v. MPD et al
as 2:2022cv02736
Plaintiff:
William D. Tims
Defendant:
MPD, Shelby Co. D.A..'s Office, U.S. Dept of Justice Western District and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meehan v. Young et al
as 2:2022cv02105
Plaintiff:
Shaun Michael Meehan
Defendant:
S. Young, Multiple Unknown Named SCSO Swat Officers and Multiple Unknown Named ATF Agents
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edwards v. Atkinson et al
as 2:2022cv02103
Plaintiff:
Donald Edwards
Defendant:
Shae Atkinson, Tiana Young and Erin Barefield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. Coffee
as 2:2021cv02121
Petitioner:
Adrian Dontrell Young
Respondent:
Judge Lee Coffee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
McFarland v. Hughes et al
as 1:2018cv01014
Defendant:
Shannon Hughes, Cpt. FNU Ulceton, Sgt. Rose Ray and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Eric McFarland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. Centurion et al
as 2:2016cv02865
Plaintiff:
Timothy Young
Defendant:
Centurion, Tennessee Department of Correction, Jason Woodal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. Gupton et al
as 2:2016cv02086
Plaintiff:
Adrian Dontrell Young
Defendant:
William J. Gupton, Jr., Doris Smith, Benita Monix and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Shelby County Division of Corrections et al
as 2:2014cv02867
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Lewis, Jr.
Defendant:
Shelby County Division of Corrections, William J. Gupton, Jr. and Hardy Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Young et al
as 2:2014cv02321
Plaintiff:
Tavarius Jones
Defendant:
Grant Young, Kevin Martin, Gary Rikard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
