Trademark Cases filed in the US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee
Cases 91 - 100 of 193
Odyssey Medical, Inc. v. Augen Opticos, S.A. de C.V. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv02797
Plaintiff: Odyssey Medical, Inc.
Defendant: Augen Opticos, S.A. de C.V.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
Chanel, Inc. v. Does 1 -172 et al
as 2:2010cv02684
Plaintiff: Chanel, Inc.
Defendant: Does 1 -172 and Does 173 - 500
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Ground Zero, Inc. v. Little Anthony's Cafe, LLC et al
as 2:2010cv02675
Plaintiff: Ground Zero, Inc.
Defendant: Little Anthony's Cafe, LLC and Anthony Burns
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
v. Chanel, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv02639
Defendant: Chanel, Inc. , Huo Cai Cai and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Reflexxion Automotive Products, LLC v. Tong Yang Group et al
as 2:2010cv02633
Plaintiff: Reflexxion Automotive Products, LLC
Defendant: Tong Yang Group, Taiwan Kai Yih Industrial Company, Ltd., T.Y.G. Products, LP and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Bright Horizons Family Solutions LLC v. Bright Horizons Academy
as 2:2010cv02604
Plaintiff: Bright Horizons Family Solutions LLC
Defendant: Bright Horizons Academy
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Chanel, Inc. v. Chen et al
as 2:2010cv02571
Plaintiff: Chanel, Inc.
Defendant: Ada Chen and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Chanel, Inc. v. Gao et al
as 2:2010cv02569
Plaintiff: Chanel, Inc.
Defendant: Shiqiang Gao and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Bravado International Group Merchandising Services, Inc. v. Various John Does et al
as 2:2010cv02551
Plaintiff: Bravado International Group Merchandising Services, Inc.
Defendant: Various John Does, Various Jane Does and Various Doe Companies
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Chanel, Inc. v. Chen et al
as 2:2010cv02449
Plaintiff: Chanel, Inc.
Defendant: Xiaoli Chen and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?