Cases 31 - 40 of 99
Turner v. State of Tennessee
as 2:2011cv02254
Petitioner:
Bruce Turner
Respondent:
David Mills
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Noland v. Easterling et al
as 1:2010cv01297
Plaintiff:
Duane E. Noland
Defendant:
Joe Easterling, Jack Carter and Deanne Mills
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Staggs v. Philmore et al
as 1:2010cv01285
Plaintiff:
Michael Kevin Staggs
Defendant:
Philmore, Dotson, Ford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Faulkner v. Steward et al
as 2:2010cv02722
Plaintiff:
David Chester Faulkner
Defendant:
Henry Steward, Tommy Mills, Thomas Shell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wingo v. Tennessee Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2010cv01259
Plaintiff:
Darrell Wingo
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Corrections, Tony Parker, Jeff Mills and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. Tenn. Dept of Corrections et al
as 1:2010cv01111
Plaintiff:
James W. Clark, Jr.
Defendant:
Tenn. Dept of Corrections, Gayle Ray, Ruben Hodge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gwin v. Mills
as 2:2010cv02081
Petitioner:
Jermaine Gwin
Respondent:
David Mills
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Miller v. State of Tennessee et al
as 2:2009cv02811
Plaintiff:
Jacob Randall Miller
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Tennessee Department of Corrections, Tommy Mills and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Saldana v. United States of America et al
as 2:2009cv02786
Petitioner:
Mario Juarez Saldana and Mario Juarez Saldana
Respondent:
United States of America and Marcel Mills
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
McAllister v. Little et al
as 2:2009cv02762
Plaintiff:
Rodney McAllister
Defendant:
George Little, Henry Stewart, Wayne Carpenter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
