Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee
Cases 41 - 50 of 90
Howard v. Donahue et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv01076
Plaintiff: Christopher Howard
Defendant: Michael Donahue, Mitch Bradshaw, Tennessee Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bradfield v. Donahue et al
as 2:2014cv02227
Petitioner: Ronnie Bradfield
Respondent: Michael Donahue and Robert Cooper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bennett v. Donahue
as 1:2014cv01067
Petitioner: Corey Alan Bennett
Respondent: Michael Donahue
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Avery v. Cassidy et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv01059
Plaintiff: Frederick A. Avery
Defendant: Sara Cassidy and Donahue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bennett v. Goowin et al
as 1:2014cv01057
Plaintiff: Corey Alan Bennett
Defendant: Goowin, Cassaday, Shouse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 1:2014cv01053
Plaintiff: Mark Wilmer Wilson
Defendant: Corrections Corporation of America, Michael Donahue, Alicia Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shaw v. Donahue
as 2:2014cv02125
Petitioner: Maurice Shaw
Respondent: Michael Donahue
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Akins v. Corrections Corporation of America et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv01040
Plaintiff: Terrance' Akins
Defendant: Corrections Corporation of America, Hardeman County Correctional Facility, Derrick Schofield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Singletary v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 1:2014cv01016
Plaintiff: Harold Singletary
Defendant: Corrections Corporation of America, Michael Donahue, Terence Dickerson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Samuel v. Donahue
as 2:2014cv02031
Petitioner: Tony Samuel
Respondent: Michael Donahue
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?