Cases 41 - 50 of 438
Sanders v. State of Tennessee
as 2:2022cv02260
Petitioner:
Don Sanders
Respondent:
State of Tennessee and Warden James M. Holloway
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Parsons v. The United States of America et al
as 2:2022cv02247
Petitioner:
Michael Wayne Parsons
Respondent:
The United States of America and The State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Williams v. State of Tennessee
as 2:2022cv02231
Petitioner:
Terrance Williams
Respondent:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davidson v. State of Tennessee
as 1:2022cv01060
Plaintiff:
Chris Ryan Davidson
Defendant:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pearson v. Attorney General of the State of Tennessee
as 2:2022cv02202
Petitioner:
Harry W. Pearson
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Tennessee and Martin Frink
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ingram v. State of Tennessee
as 2:2022cv02034
Petitioner:
Ronnie Lee Ingram
Respondent:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lee v. State of Tennessee
as 2:2022cv02028
Petitioner:
Wendolyn Lee
Respondent:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sewell v. State of Tennessee
as 2:2021cv02799
Petitioner:
Glenn Sewell
Respondent:
State of Tennessee and Warden Vincent Vantell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Davidson v. State of Tennessee et al
as 1:2021cv01192
Plaintiff:
Chris Ryan Davidson
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, John Mehr and FNU Balderrama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davidson v. State of Tennessee
as 1:2021cv01191
Plaintiff:
Chris Ryan Davidson
Defendant:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
