Cases 51 - 60 of 104
Mitchell v. Mays et al
as 2:2012cv03091
Plaintiff:
Stephen Murray Mitchell
Defendant:
Samuel H. Mays, Jr., Bernice Bouie Donald, Tony R. Arvin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. Mays et al
as 2:2012cv03090
Plaintiff:
Stephen Murray Mitchell
Defendant:
Samuel H. Mays, Jr., Bernice Bouie Donald, Tony R. Arvin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alexander v. Luttrell et al
as 2:2012cv02465
Plaintiff:
Christopher F. Alexander
Defendant:
Mark H. Luttrell, Jr, Bill Oldham, Robert Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Shelby Co. Jail et al
as 2:2012cv02457
Plaintiff:
Curtis Jerome Thomas
Defendant:
Shelby Co. Jail, A.C. Wharton, Mark H. Luttrell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Andrews v. Luttrell et al
as 2:2012cv02414
Plaintiff:
Julius T. Andrews
Defendant:
Mark H. Luttrell, Jr, Bill Oldham and Robert Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Caery v. Shelby County et al
as 2:2012cv02389
Plaintiff:
Frederick L. Caery
Defendant:
Shelby Co. Dept. of Corr., Minus Adams, Karen Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Benson v. Luttrell et al
as 2:2012cv02313
Plaintiff:
Ricky Benson
Defendant:
Mark H. Luttrell, Jr, James E. Coleman, Tonya Beasley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Benson v. State of Tennessee et al
as 2:2012cv02300
Plaintiff:
Ricky Benson
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Shelby County Government, Mark H. Luttrell, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Arvin et al
as 2:2012cv02166
Plaintiff:
Willie Davis
Defendant:
Tony R. Arvin and Mark H. Luttrell, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Newsome v. Mark H. Luttrell Correctional Center
as 2:2012cv02123
Petitioner:
Nesha Newsome
Respondent:
Mark H. Luttrell Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
