Cases 71 - 80 of 1,612
Muhammad v. Smith et al
as 2:2023cv02257
Petitioner:
Robert Muhammad and Siraj Ibrihim
Respondent:
Scott P Smith, United States Marshals Service, Chaplin Hawkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Russell v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv01069
Petitioner:
William Russell
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Jones v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv02245
Petitioner:
Omari Shabazz Jones
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Britton v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv02221
Petitioner:
Rexford Britton
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02219
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Norris v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv02215
Petitioner:
Teddy Norris
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Hall v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv02201
Petitioner:
Armoni Hall
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Perdue v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv02194
Petitioner:
Quiney Haroon Perdue
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Hunter v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv02188
Petitioner:
Steven L. Hunter
Respondent:
United States of America and Warden Bowers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Norris v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv02179
Petitioner:
Teddy Norris
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
