Cases 81 - 90 of 135
Van Blarcom v. Tennessee Dept of Corrections
as 1:2012cv01059
Plaintiff:
Roger G. Van Blarcom
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Correction
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. Tennessee Department of Correction et al
as 1:2011cv01403
Plaintiff:
Dennis Martin
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Correction, Tony Parker, Marvin Mays and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Shelby County Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2011cv03008
Plaintiff:
Carey C. Johnson, Jr.
Defendant:
Shelby County Department of Corrections and K. Rowan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Shelby County Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2011cv03009
Plaintiff:
Carey C. Johnson, Jr.
Defendant:
Shelby County Department of Corrections and Birdsong
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Huckabay v. Tennessee Department of Correction et al
as 1:2011cv01335
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Huckabay
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Correction, Reuben Hodge, Corrections Corporations of America and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mills v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 1:2011cv01281
Plaintiff:
Michael Mills
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, Joe Easterling, Rosie Kendrix and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perry v. Barbee et al
as 2:2011cv02781
Petitioner:
Christopher Perry
Respondent:
Dwight Barbee and Tennessee Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Murley v. Hammond et al
as 1:2011cv01274
Plaintiff:
Timothy W. Murley
Defendant:
Bettie Hammond and Tennessee Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hale v. NWCX et al
as 1:2011cv01031
Plaintiff:
Thomas D.E. Hale
Defendant:
NWCX, Tony Parker, Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Finley v. Tennessee Department of Correction et al
as 1:2011cv01008
Plaintiff:
Tracy T. Finley
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Correction, Tony Parker, Ruth Long and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
