Cases 31 - 40 of 50
Morris v. Easterling et al
as 1:2010cv01068
Plaintiff:
Kenny Ray Morris
Defendant:
Joe Easterling and Conner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grindstaff v. Easterling
as 1:2010cv01041
Plaintiff:
Anthony Lee Grindstaff
Defendant:
Joe Easterling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tackett v. Easterling et al
as 1:2010cv01035
Petitioner:
Troy Tackett
Respondent:
Joe Easterling and State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Anderson v. Corrections Corporation of America, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv01029
Plaintiff:
Steven Anderson
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, Inc., George Little, Commissioner of Tennessee Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tharpe v. Easterling
as 1:2009cv01283
Petitioner:
Andre Randolph Tharpe
Respondent:
Joe Easterling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bass v. Easterling
as 1:2009cv01260
Petitioner:
James DeWayne Bass
Respondent:
Joe Easterling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Croft v. State of Tennessee et al
as 1:2009cv01249
Plaintiff:
Frank Delano Croft
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Parole Board, Joe Easterling and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Easterling
as 1:2009cv01245
Petitioner:
William J. Johnson
Respondent:
Joe Easterling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Baxter v. Easterling
as 1:2009cv01244
Petitioner:
Johnny Baxter
Respondent:
Joe Easterling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Roberts v. Easterling et al
as 1:2009cv01199
Petitioner:
Terry L. Roberts
Respondent:
Joe Easterling, Stephen D. Jackson and G. Robert Radford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
