Cases filed in the US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee
Cases 31 - 40 of 42
Riley v. Collins et al
as 1:2007cv01177
Plaintiff: Billy Ray Riley
Defendant: Amanda Collins, Dennis Dean and Tommy Mills
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Little et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2007cv01117
Plaintiff: Grady DeWayne Thomas
Defendant: George Little, Roland Colson, Tommy Mills and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henry v. Mills
as 1:2007cv01107
Petitioner: Billy Henry
Respondent: Tommy Mills
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
March v. Mills et al
as 2:2007cv02296
Plaintiff: Perry A. March
Defendant: Tommy Mills, George Little, Tony Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tumblin v. Mills et al
as 1:2007cv01079
Plaintiff: Tyrone Tumblin
Defendant: Tommy Mills, Brenda F. Jones, Mike Holloway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Westbrook v. Mills
as 1:2006cv01247
Petitioner: James Westbrook
Respondent: Tommy Mills
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Contreras et al v. Little, et al.
as 1:2007cv01045
Plaintiff: Rolando Contreras, Sergio Batista, Gilberto Mendoza and others
Defendant: Mario Osorio, George Little, Roland Colson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haynes v. Mills
as 1:2007cv01036
Petitioner: James Donald Haynes
Respondent: Tommy Mills
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Mills
as 1:2007cv01029
Petitioner: James C. Johnson
Respondent: Tommy Mills
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Haynes v. Mills
as 1:2007cv01031
Petitioner: James D. Haynes
Respondent: Tommy Mills
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?