Cases filed in the US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee
Cases 61 - 70 of 75
Pugliese v. Easterling
as 1:2009cv01190
Petitioner: Daniel Pugliese
Defendant: Joe Easterling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lee v. Easterling
as 1:2009cv01139
Petitioner: Terry James Lee
Defendant: Joe Easterling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Easterling
as 1:2009cv01136
Petitioner: Thomas Earl Williams
Defendant: Joe Easterling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sanders v. Easterling
as 2:2009cv02362
Petitioner: Antonio Sanders
Respondent: Joe Easterling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. Easterling
as 2:2009cv02263
Petitioner: Ronnie Jackson
Respondent: Joe Easterling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wilhite v. Corrections Corporation of America et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv02196
Plaintiff: Calvin Wilhite and Calvin Wilhite
Defendant: Corrections Corporation of America, State of Tennessee, Hardeman County Correctional Facilities Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Torts - Injury None
Enriquez v. Easterling et al
as 1:2009cv01036
Plaintiff: Anthony Enriquez
Defendant: Joe Easterling, Barbara Buford and Citrian Crismaru
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Breedlove v. Easterling et al
as 1:2009cv01025
Plaintiff: Rodney Breedlove
Defendant: Easterling, Carroll County et al, Paul Newman and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Brewster v. Easterling
as 1:2008cv01255
Petitioner: Antonio Brewster
Respondent: Joseph Easterling
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Proby v. Easterling
as 2:2008cv02705
Petitioner: Richard Proby
Respondent: Joseph Easterling
Cause Of Action: Federal Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?