Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Russell v. Brooks Sports, Inc. et al
as 4:2021cv00961
Plaintiff:
Tammy Russell
Defendant:
Brooks Sports, Inc., Zappos.com, LLC and Amazon.Com, Inc.,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Childress v. JMS Russel Metals Corp. et al
as 2:2018cv00435
Defendant:
Norton Metal, Inc., Norton Metals, Eric Duane Banks and others
Plaintiff:
Amber Childress
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134
Gomez v. Barnett et al
as 4:2018cv00357
Plaintiff:
Becky Gomez
Defendant:
James Russell Barnett, Megan Staci Clayton and All Occupants
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Russell v. Wal-Mart Real Estate Business Trust et al
as 4:2017cv00298
Plaintiff:
Alma M. Russell
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Real Estate Business Trust , Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Edstrom, et al v. Target Corporation
as 4:2015cv00503
Plaintiff:
Margaret Edstrom , Barbara Stricklin , Russell S Thompson and others
Defendant:
Target Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Russell v. Home Depot, U.S.A., Inc.
as 6:2014cv00795
Plaintiff:
Tamara Russell
Defendant:
Home Depot, U.S.A., Inc.
Mediator:
Mike Patterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Templeton et al v. Wal-Mart Real Estate Business Trust et al
as 2:2014cv00255
Plaintiff:
Sheri Rene Templeton and James Russel Templeton
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Real Estate Business Trust, Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hill v. Master Woodcraft Cabinetry LLC et al
as 2:2012cv00698
Plaintiff:
Thomas Hill
Defendant:
Master Woodcraft Cabinetry LLC and Royce Emery Russell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Russell et al v Flint Energy Services, Inc., et al
as 2:2009cv00103
Plaintiff:
Galen Russell and Michelle Russell
Defendant:
Flint Energy Services, Inc., J.W. Williams, Inc. and Donlen Government Services, Inc. d/b/a Donlen Trust
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
