Cases 111 - 120 of 1,461
Cole v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00187
Plaintiff:
Aurora Cole
Defendant:
Ethicon Inc and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
North v. Samsung SDI America, Inc. et al
as 4:2020cv00355
Plaintiff:
Joseph North
Defendant:
Samsung SDI America Inc and Samsung SDI Co Ltd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Phillips et al v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 1:2020cv00136
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Teresa Phillips and Ellis Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 1:2020cv00137
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Edward Richardson Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kennedy et al v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 6:2020cv00169
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Brian Hall and Gwendolyn Kennedy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ustanik v. Elliott Equipment Company
as 4:2020cv00265
Defendant:
Elliott Equipment Company
Plaintiff:
James Ustanik
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hamilton v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 1:2020cv00130
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Juanita Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Simien v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 1:2020cv00131
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Dani Simien
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tatom v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 1:2020cv00128
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Larry Gene Tatom
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Houston v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 1:2020cv00127
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Houston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
