Cases 21 - 30 of 1,000
Capp v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2023cv00913
Plaintiff:
Anna Kathleen Capp
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Cozart v. Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security
as 9:2023cv00190
Plaintiff:
George Cozart
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Spikes v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2023cv00385
Plaintiff:
Douglas Dejuan Spikes
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi and Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Armstrong v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv00362
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Stevenson Armstrong
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Folkens v. Commissioner of SSA
as 1:2023cv00346
Plaintiff:
James Lee Folkens
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Gardiner v. Commissioner of SSA
as 9:2023cv00200
Plaintiff:
John David Gardiner
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Rodrigues v. Commissioner, SSA
as 4:2023cv00755
Plaintiff:
Sandy Rodrigues
Defendant:
Commissioner, SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Keys v. Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2023cv00746
Plaintiff:
Mary Jean Keys
Defendant:
Commissioner, SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Parsons v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv00324
Plaintiff:
Mark Parsons
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Ballenger v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2023cv00441
Plaintiff:
Lisa Michelle Ballenger
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
