Cases 41 - 50 of 2,778
Lanham v. Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2023cv00513
Plaintiff:
Raven Lanham
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Crawford v. Commissioner of SSA
as 1:2023cv00318
Plaintiff:
Michelle Crawford
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Rodrigues v. Commissioner, SSA
as 4:2023cv00755
Plaintiff:
Sandy Rodrigues
Defendant:
Commissioner, SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Keys v. Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2023cv00746
Plaintiff:
Mary Jean Keys
Defendant:
Commissioner, SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Prudhomme v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2023cv00358
Plaintiff:
Sandra Prudhomme
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Parsons v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv00324
Plaintiff:
Mark Parsons
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Ballenger v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2023cv00441
Plaintiff:
Lisa Michelle Ballenger
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Flemett v. Commissioner of SSA
as 9:2023cv00109
Plaintiff:
Amanda Gail Flemett
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Conner v. Commissioner, SSA
as 4:2023cv00751
Plaintiff:
Debra Conner
Defendant:
Commissioner, SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Garber v. Commissioner, SSA
as 4:2023cv00190
Plaintiff:
Billie Jo Garber
Defendant:
Commissioner, SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
